AML Review: Source of Funds Response Scenario
Sample case structure for responding to a digital-asset source-of-funds review.
Illustrative sample case. This material demonstrates the intended case-study format and does not describe a verified client engagement.
Situation
The account holder receives a broad request for proof of the origin of crypto assets.
Evidence and approach
The request is separated into specific questions and matched to supporting financial and blockchain records.
Illustrative outcome
Gaps and follow-up questions are identified before submission. This is an illustrative scenario only.
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each matter depends on its facts, evidence, platform and jurisdiction.
From First Review to Structured Escalation
Free Assessment
We confirm scope, jurisdiction and the most useful next step.
Evidence Review
Documents, transactions and notices are reviewed as one chronology.
Strategy & Engagement
We define the legal and compliance route and agree the scope.
Platform or Authority Position
The structured position is submitted and escalated where appropriate.
Outcome & Next Actions
We advise on the response and measures needed to protect your position.
Clear Scope Before Engagement
The fee model is proposed after the preliminary assessment and depends on scope, jurisdiction and recovery route.
Fixed Fee
A defined price for an agreed scope of legal or compliance work.
Staged Fees
Separate fees for assessment, submissions, negotiations and escalation.
Fixed Fee + Success Component
A fixed part combined with a result-based component where appropriate.
Get a Clear View of Your Options
Tell us what happened. We aim to respond in English within one business day.
- Evidence-led first review
- EU/EEA and cross-border support
- No seed phrases or private keys required