AML Evidence Package Prepared for Frozen Cryptoassets
Executive Summary
A private investor approached P&P after cryptoassets worth more than 40,000 USDT were frozen in connection with an AML review. The matter required explanations of the source of funds, the commercial purpose of the operations and the relationship between transactions. P&P reviewed the available records, organised the supporting evidence and prepared a legal position for communication about the restrictions. The client received a structured evidence package and a plan for the next steps. The result presented here is the completed preparation work; a subsequent release of the assets is not confirmed in the available case record.
Client Context and Objective
The client was a private investor and owner of cryptoassets. The work took place in 2026 and involved foreign counterparties and advisers.
The objective was to establish a clear evidential basis for requesting a review of the restrictions. The client needed to explain how the funds had arisen and how the supporting contracts, payments and digital transactions related to each other.
The Evidence Challenge
The transaction history covered several contracts, payments and digital transfers. Some documents had been created for commercial purposes rather than a compliance review and needed to be organised and explained.
The central challenge was connecting the transaction history with its economic purpose. Incomplete or inconsistent explanations risked weakening the request for reconsideration.
P&P Work
- Review the history of the funds. P&P analysed the client’s materials, identified the key transactions and distinguished supporting documents from gaps that required further explanation. This established the factual basis for the response.
- Organise the evidence package. Contracts, invoices, completion records, evidence of performance, a transaction table and source-of-funds explanations were prepared and systematised. The aim was to present a connected account of the operations.
- Prepare the legal position. The team explained the legal basis for holding the assets alongside the commercial rationale for the transactions. The position supplied context for further communication about reviewing the restrictions.
- Prepare materials for cross-border communication. P&P assembled materials for further interaction with foreign lawyers and counterparties involved in the review process. The client also received a realistic plan for subsequent action.
Roles and Responsibilities
The client supplied the underlying transaction and commercial records. P&P analysed those materials and prepared the evidence package and legal position. Foreign advisers and counterparties were the intended participants in subsequent communication about the restrictions; preparation of the materials did not itself determine whether the assets would be released.
Deliverables
- A structured package of contracts, invoices and documents supporting performance of obligations.
- A transaction table and explanations of the origin and commercial context of the funds.
- A legal position addressing ownership of the assets and the rationale for the operations.
- Materials for foreign advisers and counterparties, together with a plan for further action.
Result and Confirmed Scope
The client received a coherent evidence package and legal position for seeking review of the restrictions. Fragmented records were brought together into an explanation of the transaction history. Release of the cryptoassets is outside the confirmed scope of this case study.
| Starting position | Prepared outcome |
|---|---|
| More than 40,000 USDT affected by restrictions; fragmented documents and transactions requiring explanation. | Evidence package, transaction table, legal position and next-step plan prepared for further communication. |
Practical Lessons
- Explain the purpose behind the transfers. The transaction record needed contractual and commercial context to support the source-of-funds explanation.
- Present a connected set of records. Contracts, invoices, performance evidence and payments were organised together so their relationship could be understood.
- Separate preparation from the external decision. An evidence package is a concrete legal work product. Whether restrictions are lifted remains a separate outcome requiring confirmation.
Legal Support for Crypto Asset Issues
Support when access, withdrawals or transactions are restricted.
Explore service
Clear evidence mapping and structured responses to compliance requests.
Explore service
Evidence preservation and coordinated escalation after a scam or disputed transfer.
Explore serviceFrom First Review to Structured Escalation
Free Assessment
We confirm scope, jurisdiction and the most useful next step.
Evidence Review
Documents, transactions and notices are reviewed as one chronology.
Strategy & Engagement
We define the legal and compliance route and agree the scope.
Platform or Authority Position
The structured position is submitted and escalated where appropriate.
Outcome & Next Actions
We advise on the response and measures needed to protect your position.
Clear Scope Before Engagement
The fee model is proposed after the preliminary assessment and depends on scope, jurisdiction and recovery route.
Fixed Fee
A defined price for an agreed scope of legal or compliance work.
Staged Fees
Separate fees for assessment, submissions, negotiations and escalation.
Fixed Fee + Success Component
A fixed part combined with a result-based component where appropriate.
Get a Clear View of Your Options
Tell us what happened. We aim to respond in English within one business day.
- Evidence-led first review
- EU/EEA and cross-border support
- No seed phrases or private keys required